The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please use the contact us link at the bottom of the page.

Stuck at Cape York

Turbo engines and diesels especially will break catastrophically with water added and it does not take much, about half a cup full for a BMW X5. (My Grenadier was anticipated to have 2 bent con-rods, but the turbos were consider scrap).

A low revving petrol engine with a lower compression ratio is more likely to survive, (and much easier to fix).
Is non turbo diesel better than non turbo petrol? Not sure but history would suggest that as both the Willys and Land Rover series 1 were petrol and survived the Second World War that petrol is king in the most challenging of circumstances. Good call.
 
Turbo engines and diesels especially will break catastrophically with water added and it does not take much, about half a cup full for a BMW X5. (My Grenadier was anticipated to have 2 bent con-rods, but the turbos were consider scrap).

A low revving petrol engine with a lower compression ratio is more likely to survive, (and much easier to fix).
I've repaired a couple of older land-rover engines with water ingress, one just flattened a big end bearing, the other bent a conrod as well. So both fixed in a few hours for a few pounds.

WW2 jeeps would be even easier being sidevalve (flathead)

Not that those engines were comparable to modern engines.
 
Is non turbo diesel better than non turbo petrol? Not sure but history would suggest that as both the Willys and Land Rover series 1 were petrol and survived the Second World War that petrol is king in the most challenging of circumstances. Good call.
As a diesel engine has a much higher compression ratio, the damage to the con-rods or piston is more likely to be catastrophic/serious. Conversly, diesel engines are usually more robustly made.

Fishing drowned LR109 Series IIIs from deep water as a TA soldier in the early '80s, we did not have to do much more than take the plugs out, expel the water and change the oil, unless someone had driven in at full noise and fury!
 
Is non turbo diesel better than non turbo petrol? Not sure but history would suggest that as both the Willys and Land Rover series 1 were petrol and survived the Second World War that petrol is king in the most challenging of circumstances. Good call.
I've yet to meet a SI Land-Rover that survived WW2 (I know one appears in the film 633 Squadron but that's an anachronism)! 😀
 
What I remember from the original Canny video was that the vehicle in question had made it through the river. IIRC the air intake point on the fenders of each vehicle shown were often dipping below the water line. Ineos has stated that the RAI components are not watertight so I thought everything looked sketchy and evidenced bad judgement but I don't know anything about water crossings. After the crossing the party then camped for the night a very short distance further down the road. In the morning when the engine was started the vehicle made a racket, died, and leaked oil.

Here is my immediate thought at the time:

Overnight the water ingested during the day before - highly aerated and in small amounts at the time of the crossing - settled or pooled into the lowest portions of the intake system. When the vehicle was started next morning there was just enough air volume in the intercooler ahead of the where the water collected to fire up the engine for a brief moment - possibly just a single revolution or two - and then the water "plug" was stuffed into a couple of cylinders en masse resulting in an hydrolocked motor.

Or it was a sham like @Zimm said.

I saw the original video of the car in question before it was pulled. I remember cringing when I saw the area of the air intake on the fender go below the water line. I don't recall that it stalled. In fact I believe I saw the car leave the water under it's own power... so, if it's any consolation- I'm pretty sure your account is accurate.

Could it be possible that at low RPMs there was enough room in the intercooler to provide the volume of air necessary and only when a high rev event came along that the water was introduced?
 
Back
Top Bottom