Fair enough, and I agree that the engines do seem to just keep running despite the numerous glitches that keep cropping up (thank you BMW

).
This is the latest (and probably not the last) in a long list of software issues, resulting from a complete lack of proactive responsiveness from Ineos to fix the software in the first place.
Right from the start it was evident that the software is riddled with errors (it’s more like a beta version with testing code, than an actual final version). Instead of fixing it, Ineos just band-aided symptoms, which only ends up causing more problems.
It’s these ongoing preventable issues, resulting from the lack of proactivity from Ineos, that’s what the fuss is all about.
I don’t think any early adopter expected the car to be perfect out of the box, teething issues were anticipated - BUT, what we also expected is that Ineos would be there to provide support, communication and work with us to resolve problems. The general consensus is that Ineos Automotive has failed miserably on all counts, which is the biggest broken promise of all (not that Ineos seems to care).
The Grenadier is already a great 4x4, but the frustration is that we can all see just how good it could be if Ineos actually fixed the issues that are holding it back. It’s really annoying, because it shouldn’t be this hard, Ineos just doesn’t seem to be listening.
Just as an aside and an example of how these sorts of ongoing issues are impacting the Ineos product, my wife has said definite
NO to the Fusilier, she simply doesn’t have confidence in Ineos, and I can’t argue with her, because she’s not wrong (apart from the fact that she’s always right anyway

).