Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please use the contact us link at the bottom of the page.
Or did it and they made adjustments and assumed that was the fix............hmmmm ?I know some had a real beating in the southern African testing as i have met people who were involved, so curious as to why it didn’t happen then![]()
Happy to have been a tester for youI suspect the test flet wasn't big enough and they didn't torture the cars enough.
To give you an idea, when I worked in autonomous driving we did 1-2 million miles autonomous test drives a year with a tiny fleet. Total miles on cars where 4 million miles a year. Ineos in their launch report stated that they did 1.1 million miles total which to me sounded way too limited.
My company did 2 million miles in simulator a day for several years and a few hundred thousand scenario tests a day. We had a couple of steering columns and brake columns on bench tests at a few thousand of mechanical tests a day. On the vehicle dynamics side we did both full scale simulation with full physics models as well as on track and skid plate extreme scenarios while having sensors everywhere to check for approaching limits. Everything goes to databases for long term analysis. Roughly 1pb of data a year per vehicle worth of sensor data that we mined with advanced algorithms to detect wear and fault patterns.
The 1.1 million miles worried me at the time. I got more comfort when the Aussies and British became beta users and I got in post that cycle with limited infant mortality type of faults. So now is mostly wear issues as far as I can tell.
I think this is a wear issue that more extensive testing would have found but it is what it is for me -I've done the plunge and am now committed.