Is Ineos in financial woes?

[AWo]

Regarding the UK I do.: The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and Bloomberg (international) (Financial Times before Bloomberg, but I canceled that).

Is that broad enough for you? There are some not nice articles in the Daily Telegraph, as well...and from my reading experience, the Daily Telegraph is some kind of the opposite of The Guardian. or am I wrong?

For example: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...oreigners-here-message-jim-ratcliffe-man-utd/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...r-united-fans-dan-ashworth-sir-jim-ratcliffe/ (headline: Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Man Utd farce is an exercise in how not to run a football club )
Or about Ineos debts: https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-daily-telegraph/20260220/282243787058860

Some Bloomberg stuff about that? I posted already some here...as well as Financial Times...

AWo

 

[HRJ]

I thought he apologized if someone was triggered by his comment but then repeated that it was still a problem?
Possibly I read that incorrectly, I need to revisit.

 

[TD5-90]

Regarding the UK I do.: The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and Bloomberg (international) (Financial Times before Bloomberg, but I canceled that).

Is that broad enough for you? There are some not nice articles in the Daily Telegraph, as well...and from my reading experience, the Daily Telegraph is some kind of the opposite of The Guardian. or am I wrong?

For example: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...oreigners-here-message-jim-ratcliffe-man-utd/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...r-united-fans-dan-ashworth-sir-jim-ratcliffe/ (headline: Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Man Utd farce is an exercise in how not to run a football club )
Or about Ineos debts: https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-daily-telegraph/20260220/282243787058860

Some Bloomberg stuff about that? I posted already some here...as well as Financial Times...

AWo

You could & would have all done better, we know... Boring.

 

[AWo]

I know only of one comment and one apologize..
AWo

 

[HRJ]

“In his subsequent statement, Ratcliffe said sorry that his "choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe", adding that it was "important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration" and "maintain an open debate".”

Same thing. Jim should have told them (whomever asked for an apology) to get stuffed.

 

[bigleonski]

This company will not survive, their inaction is second to none. I said that two years ago on this forum several times. They always needed an experienced partner like BMW. Their Greed wouldn't allow for it. Now they are out to sea with no rudder. Much sooner that later. Today due to EU regulations and USA Tarrif's compasnies like BMW will survive since they build here in the USA. They won't touch a company stuck in the EU Regs. People with loans on their trucks will be upside down in no time. What a terrible situation. Selling off Yachts is so indicative of very choppy waters ahead! Just my opinion and I'm entitled to it just like all the other opinions on the forum.

Gees, I bet you’re fun to have around at parties. Sheeees.

 

[CRH]

Regarding the UK I do.: The Daily Telegraph, The Guardian and Bloomberg (international) (Financial Times before Bloomberg, but I canceled that).

Is that broad enough for you? There are some not nice articles in the Daily Telegraph, as well...and from my reading experience, the Daily Telegraph is some kind of the opposite of The Guardian. or am I wrong?

For example: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...oreigners-here-message-jim-ratcliffe-man-utd/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...r-united-fans-dan-ashworth-sir-jim-ratcliffe/ (headline: Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Man Utd farce is an exercise in how not to run a football club )
Or about Ineos debts: https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-daily-telegraph/20260220/282243787058860

Some Bloomberg stuff about that? I posted already some here...as well as Financial Times...

AWo

My point was that the Guardian hates people with money, Brexit supporters, the chemical industry and anyone who is mobile enough, and sensible enough to leave the UK when it saves millions of UK £'s in tax. He's a business person who makes money, not a UK government cash machine.
If you accept that it is a left wing paper then you will also understand that there is a lot of bias to the writing and that you can interpret differently.
Ok, Telegraph i right wing so you should understand how this all works, just because they both criticise the football leadership doesn't necessarily they will both agree with his other commitments or decisions.