- Local time
- 5:12 AM
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2021
- Messages
- 1,038
Compared to the offer document and prospectus, the AI is close to Shakespeare!Someone here really likes posting AI results![]()
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please use the contact us link at the bottom of the page.
Compared to the offer document and prospectus, the AI is close to Shakespeare!Someone here really likes posting AI results![]()
Reading your commentary on the link first, I got to word "emblematic", and something didn't make sense, so I read a little further, and... Naaa.. he didn't write that. So I double checked for quotation marks. LOL.Conclusion
Ineos's €650 million secured bond is emblematic of the chemical industry's struggle to reconcile growth ambitions with financial prudence. By securing long-term financing for Project ONE, the company bets on its ability to transform a carbon-intensive asset into a green flagship. Yet, with debt metrics under pressure and credit ratings in the crosshairs, the path to resilience is anything but certain. As the industry grapples with energy transitions and regulatory overhauls, Ineos's strategy offers a case study in the high-stakes art of capital structuring.
I know, I'm an Ineos employee for 17 years in the O&P business unit...but ending soon...The problem is for everyone in the industry in Europe, not just Ineos. Ineos has plants and joint ventures outside of Europe, so I don't think you can equate this to a death song.
BMW-Ineos in my mind would be a huge win.I know, I'm an Ineos employee for 17 years in the O&P business unit...but ending soon...
Keep an eye on the joint ventures... ;-)
AWo
One would only had to look at the article above for the source so, no quotation marks were not needed. Anyway, It was pulled out of the article so those interested could see what the conclusion of the original article was without them having to read the entire article if they did not desire to do so. I hope it was a helpful to some.Reading your commentary on the link first, I got to word "emblematic", and something didn't make sense, so I read a little further, and... Naaa.. he didn't write that. So I double checked for quotation marks. LOL.
For the moment (and the next 20 years) rather cheaper than clean I'm afraid. In fact, ROW doesn't give aWe need vast amounts of cheap, clean energy.