The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please use the contact us link at the bottom of the page.

Ineos want to manufacture in US

FT article this morning

Ineos Automotive is searching for sites to move production of its flagship 4x4 vehicle from France to the US, as its billionaire owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe continues to pump cash into the struggling carmaker.

Chief executive Lynn Calder told the Financial Times the group aimed to start producing its Grenadier off-roader in America “as quickly as possible” to meet local demand.


 
Last edited:
According to our news outlets, the grid won't be able to cope and because we are relying on wind and solar we won't have the power either
According to National Grid, they will be able to cope, as most charging will be forced onto the base load, mainly through cost.

Most news outlets are driven by outrage and click-bait; the energy professionals are worried as they do not trust the politicians to see anything other than a short way into the future. Infrastructure planning is multi-parliament and multi-generational, so does not mix well with politicians with PPE degrees and no idea of science and technology.
 
It takes govt subsidies and willpower.
Having just spent almost 4 weeks in the UK including remote Scotland/ Scottish islands I was surprised to see how much infrastructure exists.
Plenty of EVs and PHEVs around. Virtually no large 4X4s.

Problem is whether the grid can cope.
And copper is becoming a precious resource.
The answer lies in watt's law. .... and more insulation. :)
 
Back to the original point of this thread though, there are quite a few under-utilized auto factories in the US right now that could work for Ineos. That would probably make a lot more sense than building from s

According to our leaders we are supposed to use buses or trains 🤣🤣
or walk or ride a bicycle.
They fly in private jets because they are more important.
 
Ok, so what would you see will be manufactured in the US and what in Europe to be shipped to the US?

A good example would be the Recaro seats. Either you ship them (tariffs) or if you find an US manufacturer. But then you have to get a new homologation. I assume there are more examples: the body panels, axles or the frame. New axles alone would mean so much changes to the car....
There also might be licenses, so Ineos is bound to a manufacturer if they want to stay with that part and design ( headlights for example ) or they find a new manufacturer.
In the case of the headlights, which have a unique size (I said here already, bad strategic decision) , you either need to modify the mounting in the car (changing other parts and the car design) or you find a manufacturer who can build this size (what means new tooling for the light manufacturer, new costs for Ineos regarding the development, add at least 1,5-2 years for that incl. homologation of that single part for three world markets).

Beside the cost for a change itself there are higher costs for US manufactured parts likely. Ineos has started (at least they try) to source more parts in China, to lower the costs. Where is the sense to buy more expensive parts again?

One should remember, beside planes and aircraft carriers, building a car is one of the most complex things to do and that means a highly complex supply chain. You can't change that as easy as a statement "We like to produce in the US" is said. There is a reason why car manufacturers decide before they build a model where they are going to do that.

It is not as easy as one might think...

AWo
Even Elon Musk said that.
He said it was way more difficult than he thought.
 
Back
Top Bottom