The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please use the contact us link at the bottom of the page.

34” K03

All good, I won't buy BFG's. Baja's are basically the same weight as comparable 34.6" tires. And a lighter tire is typically lighter duty... unless they're smaller.
 
MT Baja Boss ATs are heavy af.
But they’re the only 34”+ tire that is E load rated that’ll fit stock suspension as well. The load rating may matter to some.
I’m interested in the MTs or the Toyos in 10.5x34s when mine are worn. The toyos are 7lbs lighter each, but smaller and lighter load rated.
 
All good, I won't buy BFG's. Baja's are basically the same weight as comparable 34.6" tires.
Not in my situation. The Mickeys are almost 10 lbs heavier than the KO3s.

Screenshot 2026-03-06 at 7.56.58 AM.png
Screenshot 2026-03-06 at 7.57.36 AM.png


I'd love to run 35x12.5s, but the front driveshaft pinion angles and resulting driveshaft failure is a lift non-starter for me. I also don't like the idea of running 35s without some type of viable regearing option which may or may not ever come given the speculative long term future of IA.

This leaves me with the 295/70/17s which requires zero modification to the stock suspension and the rear hatch. I'll standby happily.
 
Last edited:
Turn your front wheel, check the inside. Turn the other way, check the outside.
Are you wanting measurements? They do not rub even at full lock and flex. I've had these on all last summer offroading in Colorado and Moab UT, plus all of last weekend at MERUS adventure park near Amarillo. Happy to measure if that is what you are looking for.
 
Bejezus man. What kind of a dog do you have in the back there
Ha, I was on an articulation rack so I could see how much flex the suspension had. Drive up the rack on the front left until the rear left looses traction. It fully had the rear stuffed in the wheel well.
IMG_2803.jpeg
 
Not in my situation. The Mickeys are almost 10 lbs heavier than the KO3s.

View attachment 7923059View attachment 7923060

I'd love to run 35x12.5s, but the front driveshaft pinion angles and resulting driveshaft failure is a lift non-starter for me. I also don't like the idea of running 35s without some type of viable regearing option which may or may not ever come given the speculative long term future of IA.

This leaves me with the 295/70/17s which requires zero modification to the stock suspension and the rear hatch. I'll standby happily.
For that size, I see it, but they’re only 33.25” calculated. The 34.6” MTs weigh the same and I wouldn’t bother regearing.
 
For that size, I see it, but they’re only 33.25” calculated. The 34.6” MTs weigh the same and I wouldn’t bother regearing.
They weigh the same because 255s are pizza cutters. Speedo off. Shifting patterns off likely requiring more frequent downshifts especially on inclines. May require a lift?

Hard pass.
 
I’ve not read anyone observe any shifting changes here, but would be interested in reading if I missed that somewhere. That would only relate to the diameter of the tire, not the width. A lift is not required, and that has been verified several times here.
 
Recommended wheel width is minimum 8.5” for a 315 tire. Any lift totally compromises front driveshaft pinion angles.
Running owl wheels. I think it's been verified on this forum that failure occurs even when stock. Technically, when lifting your vehicle we are still within the actual range of the joint. Its the boot that fails. Which leads to lack of grease. Which leads to failure.

$180 joint and an hour of my time? No brainer. Check at oil change, replace every 30k. I do too much highway driving to switch to a u joint shaft. Not stopping me from a mild lift. And I've done almost 40k miles in 7 months.

To the main point of the thread; 315/70r17. Minimal lift. Minimal rub.
 
Running owl wheels. I think it's been verified on this forum that failure occurs even when stock.Technically, when lifting your vehicle we are still within the actual range of the joint. It's the boot that fails. Which leads to lack of grease. Which leads to failure.
I'm presuming Owl wheels are 8" wide like most other aftermarket wheels atm.

I can cite maybe one that has failed bone stock on this forum. Miniscule. Lifted? Material. Warranty coverage IA denied. The pinion angles get worse as you lift, period.

Mod at your own risk.

I'm waiting until the aftermarket releases a viable solution. I'd love to run 35x12.5 tires on 17x8.5s someday, but happy with my stock steelies and 295/70s. Plug and play.
 
What I wrote about my “34’s”:
Slight lift, still stock and under warranty:
The 2024/25 models have a BFG K02 option which for the 18 inch wheel is a 255/70R18 with a total height of approximately 32”. For 2026 Ineos is going to offer the new K03 tires from BFG presumably in the same 32 inch size. I just purchased the new K03 tire 285/70/18 that makes it a 34” size tire, which is the largest you can go without a suspension lift and it’s about an inch wider. However, I also added the stiffer springs that come with the front winch option from Ineos which raised it approximately another half inch and helped to level the front. I think this will help a lot with a little extra ground clearance and looks better.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5253.jpeg
    IMG_5253.jpeg
    5.1 MB · Views: 4
  • IMG_5281.jpeg
    IMG_5281.jpeg
    6.5 MB · Views: 4
Back
Top Bottom