The rear locker state detection logic could use further investment.
When locked the truck performs great. Sometimes the detection logic is unable to confirm the lock and drops you out of lock after a time out. Most times, the detection logic is unable to confirm unlocked until a full 90 degree turn is made which is often not possible on trail. Also, currently, if my vehicle is in the unlocking state, I cannot reengage the lock. Above means the owners manual guidance of only locking for the technical bit and immediately unlocking is not practical. Instead the current detection logic weaknesses means you have to lock early and stay locked most of the time. At least this is the behavior of my truck’s production instance.
It would be safer if I could lock/unlock the hubs whenever and not have to wonder if the vehicle is going to change state on me in the middle of a tricky section because the chosen indirect implementation method of wheel sensor programming logic is not robust. Surely Eaton has a direct detection method, even if it as simple as “is there a voltage applied to the locker circuit?”
Yes, there are driving techniques to compensate. And yes, I love driving this truck. But this is a thread about improvements, hence my $0.02.