I thought the whole thing about assuming contracts and “building the van at a loss” was bizarre. I do a lot of M&A work - when you buy a company, you price in the whole balance sheet. She made it sound like she was doing something extraordinary- but that’s how acquisitions work. It’s how it always works - you are assuming the liabilities of the acquired entity, and that is reflected in the purchase price. Or she could refund the deposits and progress payments and start from scratch. Really the only exception to this is if you buy a company that has declared bankruptcy, liquidated its assets, courts have resolved what assets or refunds depositors get, and you are just buying IP or brand name or something. Just a very weird statement to make - as if in her mind, there is a “BruderX” ledger and a “her” ledger and she is compensating the other at her expense. That’s not an Australian thing or a US thing - that’s just business.
It also sounds like they were in dire straits- to say they “turned the EXP supply chain back on” and were ABOUT to start the ADX line - it sounds like they were being shut off from suppliers and creditors, TBH. And if they really took 10% deposits on 126 ADX units (I think that was the # mentioned), and hadn’t started building any??? That’s a major liquidation scenario, if not possibly more serious consequences. Those comments would definitely raise eyebrows in an investor meeting. Hope they get things back on solid footing - super cool products.