- Local time
- 6:49 AM
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2022
- Messages
- 256
- Reaction score
- 558
Stutz BlackhawkAustin Seven Swallow
Stutz BlackhawkAustin Seven Swallow
Stutz BlackhawkAustin Seven Swallow
Who were also subject to legal action by JLR for using the Defender name for a product. JLR lost that case as well.There’s a Canadian company called Bombardier. They make airplanes and jet skis amongst other stuff.
This"Fancy a pint?"
The Ineos Pint: a 90 series rival
Well,You mean like the Jensen Interceptor? Or the Gilbern Invader? Or the Reliant Scimitar?
Not sure if it existed elsewhere, but here in the States there was a Jeep Commander. Probably 10+ years ago now, but it was an attempt to enter the over-size 3-row SUV game. I don’t think it did too well.If Ineos were to register names from all the military services, the Ineos Commander sounds pretty good.
On the other hand. Ineos 'Able Seaman' wouldn't have quite the same ring.
GrrrrrSounds like a furphy to me...
I started to write that yesterday but wasn’t sure than whether I mixed it up with the Jeep Compass and deleted everything before posting.Not sure if it existed elsewhere, but here in the States there was a Jeep Commander. Probably 10+ years ago now, but it was an attempt to enter the over-size 3-row SUV game. I don’t think it did too well.
I've always understood, for the UK at least, that trademarks are only granted for specific product groups. So it's possible for the same trademark to be held by multiple persons each for a different product type.Grrrrr
The fact names and words used for hundreds of years as common dictionary reference can be "trademarked" is a bloody joke. What next, they TM the word 4X4 or Beer or Car...
Agreed.. Stinks likeGrrrrr
The fact names and words used for hundreds of years as common dictionary reference can be "trademarked" is a bloody joke. What next, they TM the word 4X4 or Beer or Car...
If Ineos were to register names from all the military services, the Ineos Commander sounds pretty good.
On the other hand. Ineos 'Able Seaman' wouldn't have quite the same ring.
That is the system it should work worldwideI've always understood, for the UK at least, that trademarks are only granted for specific product groups. So it's possible for the same trademark to be held by multiple persons each for a different product type.
As an example, whilst it's widely report that JLR lost their trademark case with Ineos, they were actually granted the trademarks in relation to:
Class 9 which includes Computer mouses; Web cameras (Webcams); Discs for storage of digital media; Mobile phone headsets and accessories; Mobile phone covers; Mobile phone cases; Mouse mats; Home theater systems; Televisions; Calculators; Projectors; Contact lenses; spectacles.
Class 14: Statues and statuettes of precious metals.
Class 28: Balloons; Sporting articles; Christmas decorations.
Well both are pretty crappy vehicles so you weren't too far off!I started to write that yesterday but wasn’t sure than whether I mixed it up with the Jeep Compass and deleted everything before posting.
Now I know I wasn’t wrong
Jeep commander was just a grand cherokee with a different body on wasn't itWell both are pretty crappy vehicles so you weren't too far off!
I believe it was - but maybe a stretched platform? It was unibody and, more than anything, ugly IMO.Jeep commander was just a grand cherokee with a different body on wasn't it